<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plato and Unreasonable Mathematicians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ilfilosofo.com/blog/2008/04/12/plato-mathematician-quote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ilfilosofo.com/blog/2008/04/12/plato-mathematician-quote/</link>
	<description>A blog about philosophy, Christianity, web development and whatever else I feel like writing about.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gianpiero</title>
		<link>http://www.ilfilosofo.com/blog/2008/04/12/plato-mathematician-quote/#comment-197241</link>
		<dc:creator>gianpiero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilfilosofo.com/?p=439#comment-197241</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on your beautiful post. Before I read it, the picture looked odd to me. I’ve checked my Italian translation and it sounds like: 
“Surely you would not regard experts in mathematics as masters of dialectic. 
Certainly not, except a very few of those I have met”

I remember that Plato in The Republic says also that mathematics it’s a good training for dialectics because, it’s very easy to understand.
What would have he thought today? 
What would have he thought about integral calculus, non-Euclidean geometry, complex numbers and so on?

(sorry for my english)...

Bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on your beautiful post. Before I read it, the picture looked odd to me. I’ve checked my Italian translation and it sounds like:<br />
“Surely you would not regard experts in mathematics as masters of dialectic.<br />
Certainly not, except a very few of those I have met”</p>
<p>I remember that Plato in The Republic says also that mathematics it’s a good training for dialectics because, it’s very easy to understand.<br />
What would have he thought today?<br />
What would have he thought about integral calculus, non-Euclidean geometry, complex numbers and so on?</p>
<p>(sorry for my english)&#8230;</p>
<p>Bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
